Marxists view Socialism as a stage of transition. In order to incrementally nudge a regime from Capitalism to Communism over, let’s say…a hundred years. Many things have to be managed and controlled to incorporate a communal structure, but most importantly,
spreading a general acceptance of Socialism is the first step. This step has long been taken in America.
Socialism is best defined as the art of taking revenue from one individual and giving it to another. They believe in a collective ownership – of everything; property, revenue production, distribution and national resources. Collectivist principles are promoted through a misrepresented ‘better for the whole’ strategy. Collective ownership basically means government owns everything and operates everything. I call it servitude (serfdom) or slavery, if you will.
Centralized power = Centralized control
What better route to socialism is there than to convince Americans that “social justice” is the only way out? First create a financial crisis and elect the proper leader to “progress” the country in another direction. Give the people no other option as housing values, stocks and jobs plummet, turning mortgages upside down, life savings cut to threads and recovery dramatically dimmed by lack of employment opportunity.
It’s the people who perceive themselves to have power that actually implement tyrannical rule. It is those that detest individualism and individual liberties. It is those that have attacked capitalism throughout history. Could they’ve imagined harnessing that power? Could they position themselves to capitalize on a new system?
Are There Greedy Capitalists?
Sure there are, these few are what sustains the whole argument against Capitalism. Are there not greedy political leaders and special interest groups? Of course, but a free market system can easily balance that of big corporate greed while none of our checks and balances could ever correct a ruling class or communist system. A free market is especially successful in this informational and communication age where we cast our vote with our dollars.
There hasn’t been one communist country that hasn’t had to resort to capitalistic measures as some sort of fix for their flawed social design – for their very survival. This excerpt from a former socialist and world philosopher, Robert Heilbroner.
It has been the Friedmans, Hayeks, von Miseses, e tutti quanti who have maintained that capitalism would flourish and that socialism would develop incurable ailments. Mises called socialism “impossible” because it has no means of establishing a rational pricing system; Hayek added additional reasons of a sociological kind (“the worst rise on top”). All three have regarded capitalism as the “natural” system of free men; all have maintained that left to its own devices capitalism would achieve material growth more successfully than any other system.
From Robert Heilbroner.
“The World After Communism.”
Dissent (Fall 1990): 429–430.
Are you willing to trial the tried and failed principles – again? Will you fall for the advancement of “Progressive” theory when it’s anything but new? By changing the name and calling it progress should tell you something right there. Make no mistake, their final goal is to push us into a one world government. Some people call this a conspiracy theory (how else would you defend taking America down). The whole concept isn’t such a great jump from where we are now given the IMF and our major contributions to other countries. We not only bail out failed banks, auto manufacturers and wall street but we bail out other countries.
Analyze the whole GM fallout with bailout followed by a structured bankruptcy, here’s a breakdown of what happened (because it’s so easy to forget); GM’s IPO, fuzzy math, and politics by Michael Rose – Examiner.com. Pay attention to coming updates as China (insider list) and the Union (UAW) made out with the big wins while the taxpayer receives a mere 25% return on their investment. This is straight up Socialism folks.
Want to know how God feels about a one world government and changing individuals from stone to more uniform and equal bricks? Re-read the story about the Tower of Babel.
The time is now to choose for or against as the building (structure) and promotions (indoctrination) culminate for an overthrow that’s no doubt set to roll.
Our Constitutional architects and writers toiled, pondered and lamented whilst contributing everything thing they had in order to draft a system of responsible governance that foremost protects your individual liberty and God-given unalienable rights. Dare we forget that battles have been waged and lost – wars have been declared and won but billions of lives were given to keep us free and billions more lives were adversely compromised and impacted in defense of the same historically signed piece of parchment.
On an entirely different note, check out what Sandy Meeks has been up to; Random Topics